Dear Staff Sergeant 7
This is in reference to your applicat
naval record pursuant to the p
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member
Records, sitting in executive s
application on 10 April 2014.
injustice were reviewed in accor
regulations and procedures appli
Board. Documentary material consider
of your application, together with al
naval record an
panel of the Board for
ession
Your 4
dance
cable
regulations and
report of the Headqua
Review Board (PERB),
attached.
dated 31 January
onscientious consi
ound that the ¢
lish the exis
In this connecti
After careful and c
record, the Board f
insufficient to estab
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments
The Board did not condone t
fitness report, but was una
view of the above, your app
and votes of the members of the panel
request.
rovisions o
In addition, the Boar
e Corps Performance
contained in t
be late submission of the c
ble to find this invalidated it.
lication has been denied.
Sw
JSR
Docket No: NR1696-14
10 April 2014
son for correction of your
f title 10 of the
Correction of Naval
, considered your
Lllegations of error and
with administrative
to the proceedings of this
ed by the Board consisted
1 material submitted in
d applicable statutes,
dad considered the
Evaluation
2014, a copy of which is
deration of the entire
vidence submitted was
tence of probable material
the Board substantially
he report of the PERB.
ontested
In
The names
will be furnished upon
on,
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
TRAD. A
ROBERT D. 4 MAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5203 14
d applicable statutes, the Board considered the rformance Evaluation . a copy of which is Lentious consideration of the entire After careful and cons i ce submitted was f probable material the Board substantially he report of the PERB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10695 14
DErARIMWEMN! Ur the RAY T PAAR PARP FRM PFr Ee TION Ae NAN Se preompr 701 5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100i ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dear Master ‘
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9159 14
The Board and 18 December 2014 with also considered your y 2015 with enclosu enclosures, 9 Januar Information act reply dated 6 October 20 the command investigation dated 1 August with enclosures - applicatio injustice were regulations 4m 2014, copies ° 4 with redacted copy of 2013) and 6 March 2015 sideration of the entire itted was bable material ious con he ‘evidence subm tablish the existence of pro In this connection, the Board substantially omments contained in the reports of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4737 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4734 14
You requested completely removing Addendum Page 2 of 2 from your fitness report for 7 October 2010 to 25 April 2011. It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested Addendum Page by removing “In fact, I would rank [you] among the pottom 1/2 of all Marine Sergeants I have observed over the past 22 years of service.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5292 14
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4711 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within New evidence is prior to making is important to attaches to all one year from the date of the Board’s decision. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5248 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10590 14
You requested completely removing the fitness reports for 1 April to 30 November 2008 and 1 December 2008 to 1 March 2009 oO It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed completely removing the contested report for 1 April to 30 November 2008 and modifying the report for 1 December 2008 to 1 March 2009 (by sana from section K.4 (reviewing officer's comments), “[You] woul benetit + rom increasing [your] follow through and mission erat ent A three-member panel of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4256 14
You requested modifying the fitness reports for 13 June 2010 to 31 March 2011 and 1 April to 22 August 2011 in accordance with the reporting senior’s (RS‘’s) letter dated 1 May 2013 and the reviewing officer’s (RO’s) endorsement dated 3 May 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction...